<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goldilocks&#8217; website uses Blackhat SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2007/12/18/goldilocks-red-ribbon-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2007/12/18/goldilocks-red-ribbon-seo/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online, Google Adsense, SEO, Stocks, Forex, Mutual Funds Philippines</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 03:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: maia</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2007/12/18/goldilocks-red-ribbon-seo/#comment-78646</link>
		<dc:creator>maia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2007/12/18/goldilocks-red-ribbon-seo/#comment-78646</guid>
		<description>yeah... and what's with that "black hat" anyway?? to my extent, all i know is blackhat is an organization of "bad" hackers... is it correct? so, what's with that and how come they do that? what comes into my mind is something like "illegal"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah&#8230; and what&#8217;s with that &#8220;black hat&#8221; anyway?? to my extent, all i know is blackhat is an organization of &#8220;bad&#8221; hackers&#8230; is it correct? so, what&#8217;s with that and how come they do that? what comes into my mind is something like &#8220;illegal&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cell jacela</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2007/12/18/goldilocks-red-ribbon-seo/#comment-11205</link>
		<dc:creator>cell jacela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 06:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2007/12/18/goldilocks-red-ribbon-seo/#comment-11205</guid>
		<description>I would not rule out black hat SEO right away since this article just showed Search Engine Ranking and Position Results on  Red Ribbon's primary and long-tail keywords and not a technical dissection of the methodology  the Goldilocks websites did. It is not unusual to find your top competitors on organic search results specially when you have 18+++ competitors only directly or indirectly campaigning for that those keywords.

It is even unfair to call it "black hat seo" on Goldilocks end, as they themselves may have not known what technically they did to have been placed on that SERP.

What would have been a good approach was to educate first the readers what he/she categorically meant by "black  hat seo" and technically dissected the site  and presented what he/she found out - similarly how the german BMW site was presented years before.

A good SERP,even at the VERY long tail level, is not directly proportional to  black hat practices on the competitors side. Goldilocks is not even no.1 if you have observed.

On having different results from the US and Philippines Google search.. errr? they belong to different DATACENTERS and google sets different criteria for each.SEO 101

Geeeeezzzz.Who wrote this anyway? hahahaha.

Hunger makes the world go round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not rule out black hat SEO right away since this article just showed Search Engine Ranking and Position Results on  Red Ribbon&#8217;s primary and long-tail keywords and not a technical dissection of the methodology  the Goldilocks websites did. It is not unusual to find your top competitors on organic search results specially when you have 18+++ competitors only directly or indirectly campaigning for that those keywords.</p>
<p>It is even unfair to call it &#8220;black hat seo&#8221; on Goldilocks end, as they themselves may have not known what technically they did to have been placed on that SERP.</p>
<p>What would have been a good approach was to educate first the readers what he/she categorically meant by &#8220;black  hat seo&#8221; and technically dissected the site  and presented what he/she found out - similarly how the german BMW site was presented years before.</p>
<p>A good SERP,even at the VERY long tail level, is not directly proportional to  black hat practices on the competitors side. Goldilocks is not even no.1 if you have observed.</p>
<p>On having different results from the US and Philippines Google search.. errr? they belong to different DATACENTERS and google sets different criteria for each.SEO 101</p>
<p>Geeeeezzzz.Who wrote this anyway? hahahaha.</p>
<p>Hunger makes the world go round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louie</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2007/12/18/goldilocks-red-ribbon-seo/#comment-10983</link>
		<dc:creator>Louie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 17:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2007/12/18/goldilocks-red-ribbon-seo/#comment-10983</guid>
		<description>LOL maybe Goldilocks has greater pagerank than Red Ribbon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL maybe Goldilocks has greater pagerank than Red Ribbon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
