<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Performance returns of mutual funds in the Philippines (as of 12-08-2006)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2006/12/14/performance-returns-of-mutual-funds-in-the-philippines-as-of-12-08-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2006/12/14/performance-returns-of-mutual-funds-in-the-philippines-as-of-12-08-2006/</link>
	<description>Make Money Online, Google Adsense, SEO, Stocks, Forex, Mutual Funds Philippines</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: pinoymoneytalk</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2006/12/14/performance-returns-of-mutual-funds-in-the-philippines-as-of-12-08-2006/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>pinoymoneytalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 04:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2006/12/14/performance-returns-of-mutual-funds-in-the-philippines-as-of-12-08-2006/#comment-831</guid>
		<description>Diversification is appropriate only when you are trying to spread out the risk. If you are looking to invest only in bond funds, it might be better to simply choose one fund. Otherwise you'll be spreading your resources too thin. Personally, I'll go for a fund that is stable and reliable, with history of above-average earnings and with reasonable fees or charges. 

Time horizon to base investment decisions? I think 3 years (at the least) is good enough to check the track record of a fund. But as they always say, historical performance is not a guarantee of future results. "Betting" on new or small fund may actually yield higher results compared to "blue chip" funds because the former are more risk-tolerant compared to the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diversification is appropriate only when you are trying to spread out the risk. If you are looking to invest only in bond funds, it might be better to simply choose one fund. Otherwise you&#8217;ll be spreading your resources too thin. Personally, I&#8217;ll go for a fund that is stable and reliable, with history of above-average earnings and with reasonable fees or charges. </p>
<p>Time horizon to base investment decisions? I think 3 years (at the least) is good enough to check the track record of a fund. But as they always say, historical performance is not a guarantee of future results. &#8220;Betting&#8221; on new or small fund may actually yield higher results compared to &#8220;blue chip&#8221; funds because the former are more risk-tolerant compared to the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celljacela</title>
		<link>http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2006/12/14/performance-returns-of-mutual-funds-in-the-philippines-as-of-12-08-2006/#comment-827</link>
		<dc:creator>Celljacela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pinoymoneytalk.com/2006/12/14/performance-returns-of-mutual-funds-in-the-philippines-as-of-12-08-2006/#comment-827</guid>
		<description>Galing

I really appreciate this kind of information. Would you suggest spreading out investment across different bond funds or will it better off to invest in one?

What is a valid time horizon to base investment decisions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galing</p>
<p>I really appreciate this kind of information. Would you suggest spreading out investment across different bond funds or will it better off to invest in one?</p>
<p>What is a valid time horizon to base investment decisions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
